Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Julian's avatar

Very intriguing. Regarding the Galilean LLM, I suspect that until you can posit ‘how would an LLM change its understanding of the way the world is?’ it would always be re-training. But then it’s a language model after all and not a general purpose AI.

Sorry but the pedant in me needs to point out that the glass is only thicker on the bottom because it was made that way (blown not float). Flow rate is approx 1nm per billion years.

ref: https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jace.15092

Expand full comment

No posts